|
Rape
and other torture in Iraq The present outcry over the torture of Iraqi prisoners by US and UK forces in Iraq would never have happened if the photos had not been published. Their publication and the impact they have had signal that the biggest anti-war movement the world has ever seen has had a profound effect on everyone. The US and UK governments ignored it, hoping it would go away but it never has. It is this movement which has pushed these images onto our screens and front pages across the world. Governments tried to claim – as usual – that this exposure of their actions was “irresponsible,” but without the photos the torture and killing that had been documented for a year would never have been available to us: the precondition to our being able to stop it. In the same way, the anti-Vietnam war movement gave us the tragic photo of the little girl burning from US napalm referred to now as a turning point in ending that war. 1.
Hidden from history – the impact of war and
occupation on women and girls
The economic interests behind the atrocities are barely mentioned; their implications for women have been totally hidden. The privatisation of everything, from oil to water, electricity, etc., imposed by the US as soon as it had occupied Iraq, has given powers to employers they never had before. Paul Bremer has banned all unions and set public sector wages at $40, less than half the recommended monthly wage of a sweatshop worker in neighbouring Iran. At Najebeeya electricity plant in Basra, where women make up 10% of the workforce, “the nursery has been turned over to a friend of the boss who has made it into a second home for himself, leaving working mothers to work with their children in tow.” And of course there is no equal pay and women get $15-25 less than men for doing the same job. The same is happening in US occupied Haiti, where the US has put sweatshop owners and their friends back in charge. After seven months of relentless organising, the first conference of workers’ unions and councils in Iraq took place in Baghdad on 8 December, 2003. After discussion, key issues were decided upon: a list of workers’ immediate demands, a draft for a new Iraqi Labour Code and the main outlines of its legislature, as well as the election of the union leadership committee members. The attendees then established the Workers' Councils and Unions in Iraq – WCUI. Within two days, their offices were raided and destroyed by the US army. And what about Saddam Hussein’s informers? Former women intelligence officers, the same people who handed over lists of suspected "prostitutes" (or resistance activists) to security forces during Saddam's "faithfulness campaign", are among those retrained by the occupation. At that time, hundreds of women were beheaded in public or strung up outside their homes. What will happen now? We have read that girls as young as nine who have been raped have been refused hospital treatment, and that in Basra unveiled female students are being refused entry to university and even attacked with stones and acid. Women everywhere have a right to know about our sisters and their children in Iraq and elsewhere, and we want to know now. 2.
The context of torture in Iraq – what the US
and UK have done elsewhere And what about the north of Ireland, which, we are told, is where the British learnt “to behave”? What about the torture, shootings and other atrocities they committed there since 1969, in particular the strip-searching (and manhandling) of women at Armagh prison by male guards and soldiers? It took a women’s movement to bring attention to and halt this sexual assault. Channel Four News (UK) has reported that at least 12,000 people are being held in US army prisons around the world – in Middle East countries, Diego Garcia (stolen from the expelled Chagossian people with the help of the British government), etc. (10 May) We want to know if there are any women among them, why they are being held, the conditions in which they are being held, and whether their families have been notified. And since the US funds and backs in every other way Israel’s occupation in Palestine (and in Israel torture and assassinations are legal), we also want to know what is happening to Palestinian women and children at the hands of Israeli troops and prison guards. Also, we want to know about the treatment of civilians, beginning with women and children, in that other occupied country, Haiti, where thousands have already been killed either by US troops or by the gangsters and drug lords they have put in power in that persecuted country. (Let us remind people that for 200 years, since Haiti’s working people, who were slaves at the time, liberated themselves by throwing out their European masters, Haiti has been invaded, occupied, boycotted and in every way persecuted by the racist US government with the assistance of the racist French government whose Napoleon met his first Waterloo in Haiti all those years ago.) And we want to know about Colombia, where US-funded and trained government and paramilitaries have been murdering thousands of civilians, including many women, for opposing violence and exploitation. We know that some women Members of the UK Parliament voted against this war, and some distinguished themselves with their uncompromising opposition. But most voted for it. We know that only one congresswoman, Barbara Lee (a Black woman representing a largely Black constituency – the sector of people who have been most opposed to war), voted against the invasion of Iraq. In fact she was the only US legislator who voted against. 3. All who accept US leadership share responsibility
Neither
blood nor rape for oil Letter to US Congresswomen from International Women Count Network re: suppression of information about rape in Iraq Excerpts from a paper by Rev. Dorothy Mackey, former US Air Force Captain and Commander who herself suffered rape and sexual assault while a serving officer, at the hands of her colonel and lieutenant colonel. Neither was ever prosecuted. June 5 Protest in Los Angeles - Neither Blood Nor Rape for Oil "Rape in Iraq", letter to the Editor from Black Women's Rape Action Project and Women Against Rape, The Guardian (London, England), May 24, 2004 |