Open letter to Brent Primary Care Trust (PCT)
Demand for immediate restoration of contract with
Royal London Homeopathic Hospital (RLHH)
Nigel Webb, Chief Executive
Brent Primary Care Trust
116 Chaplin Road
Wembley, Middlesex
HA0 4UZ
International Women’s
Day, 8 March 2007
Dear Nigel Webb,
We the undersigned write to express our outrage at the abrupt
termination of the contract between Brent Primary Care Trust (PCT)
and the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital (RLHH). As patients,
carers and other supporters of the hospital, many of us on low
incomes (benefits, pensions or low wages), we demand the immediate
restoration of this much-valued service to all Brent residents.
Founded in 1849, the RLHH is the oldest homeopathic
hospital in the world. There are five homeopathic hospitals in the
UK – Bristol, Glasgow, Liverpool, London and Milton Keynes. RLHH is
the largest, treating around 2,000 patients per week.
In
addition to homeopathy, it offers acupuncture and other
complementary therapies.
Brent PCT’s decision means that
residents can no longer be referred by their GP to the RLHH. It
denies users access to established treatments which are effective
and an alternative to conventional medicine, which is often
invasive, toxic and expensive. Many of us stopped conventional
treatment in other hospitals after a bad experience and chose to go
to the RLHH instead. We have found that it provides a better level
of individual care, more sensitive and person-centred than other NHS
facilities. Homeopathy has
had a dramatic positive effect on our health. RLHH patients from
Brent include babies and children, older people, and people with
chronic pain and disability, including those with MS, ME, diabetes
complications, cancer, depression and those who have complications
following surgery and maladministration of drugs.[i]
As Brent NHS users, we do not
want to lose access to the RLHH.
The very
next day after making its decision on 23 November 2006, Brent PCT
wrote to tell patients that their treatment at the RLHH was
terminated. There was no advance notice or consultation. Some of us
only found out at a public meeting organised by the League of
Friends of RLHH on 29 January 2007, where some 150 Brent residents
expressed their fury. But no-one from Brent PCT addressed us.
We found ourselves abandoned in
mid-treatment, while others waiting to be seen have had their
treatment cancelled. Others still who were counting on using the
RLHH in the near future will no longer be able to do so. Some of us
have only just found out that we could have had homeopathic
treatment on the NHS; we are angry that the PCT never informed us
and we want this option available to us now.
We do not accept that there is
insufficient evidence to validate the contract.
On the contrary, there is plenty of evidence, not only of demand for
homeopathy from NHS users and doctors
but of its effectiveness.
1.
The demand for
Homeopathy on the NHS has increased.
·
43% of PCTs provide access to complementary and alternative medicine
(CAM) either wholly or largely free, with acupuncture, chiropractic,
homeopathy, osteopathy, therapeutic massage and nutritional therapy
being the services most commonly provided.[ii]
·
The Patients’ Association has called for greater access to
complementary medicine on the NHS.[iii]
·
70% of GPs think that some access to complementary medicine should
be available on the NHS.[iv]
·
One in four
members of the public want to see complementary medicine on the NHS.[v]
·
A 2000 Law Lords
report lists homeopathy as one of the ‘Big Five’
complementary and alternative
therapies, and recommended a more integrated approach to medicine
and healthcare with more access to such therapies on the NHS,
not less.
·
In 2005, 67%
of individual GPS and 85% of practices in the Camden PCT area made
referrals to RLHH, an increase of 29% over previous years.[vi]
·
Elsewhere access to
complementary and alternative
therapies on the NHS is being extended:
pilot schemes are planned for Northern Ireland and Wales.
·
In Scotland, the Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital has set a
standard of patient-centered care of extraordinary beauty and
therapeutic value which should be adopted by NHS hospitals
everywhere.
·
Homeopathy
is widely available through other European public health systems
including France, Greece and Italy.
We are constantly bombarded with
claims that changes to the NHS are based on offering patients choice
when in fact choice is constantly undermined.
Homeopathy should be available not
only to those who can afford to pay for it privately. To do so
discriminates against people on low incomes, especially women and
people of colour whose average income is lower than white men’s but
who happen to be homeopathy’s most likely users.
We launch this letter
on International Women’s Day because women are homeopathy’s main
users and practitioners. As society’s main carers women
provide, unwaged, more
healthcare than all the health services of the world put together.
We take
responsibility for the health and well-being of loved ones –
children, partners, parents, friends, neighbours and relatives –
from the cradle to the grave, from breastfeeding and daily food
provision to nursing and emotional support, often putting our own
health last. Those of us with disabilities and long-term ill health
are usually seen as the receivers of care, but we often also do
caring work for others, especially children and partners.
Most complementary and
alternative practitioners – as most
hospital and other healthcare staff – are also women.
As the key decision-makers on health matters in our families and
communities, women want the best for those we care for. We deserve
to be consulted, listened to and offered access to treatments which
are safe, effective and holistic. PCT’s decision to terminate
RLHH’s contract without any consultation, affects women most and is
therefore sexist.
The decision dismisses the experiences and wishes of many Brent
residents. It is not only women but people of colour[vii]
who are more likely to use
complementary and alternative therapies,
particularly people of Asian descent since homeopathy is one of the
main healthcare systems used in the Asian subcontinent. As
Brent is one of the most ethnically diverse boroughs in the country
with people of colour in the majority, according to the 2001 ONS
Census, denying free access to homeopathy in the borough surely
amounts to racist discrimination.
We also want to point out that
access to complementary and alternative therapies has been shown to help
overcome men’s acknowledged reluctance to address health issues.[viii]
Why undermine a major provider of such therapies?
2. Homeopathy is effective.
Homeopathy’s reputation for effectiveness in this country was
established beyond doubt during the cholera epidemic of the 1840s.
80% of affected people survived when treated with homeopathy
compared to only 20% with conventional treatments.
Much research confirms the effectiveness of homeopathy for a wide range
of illnesses. Below are a few recent examples:
·
A study commissioned by the Prince of Wales concluded
that homeopathy improved conditions such as anxiety, stress and
depression, and needed fewer follow up appointments.[ix]
It also found that homeopathy could be relatively easily integrated
into the NHS and would offer potentially significant cost savings.
·
45% of GPs
consider homeopathy useful; 60% of the doctors who use it do so
because they have found it effective and due to anxiety about the
hazards of conventional treatment.
[x]
·
Impact
Integrated Medicine Project in Nottingham provided free treatment
including homeopathy with funding from the New Deal for Communities
(2004 to 2006). Impact’s 2006 Annual Report states that during this
time, 87% of patients reported reducing or stopping prescribed
medication; 76% saw their GP less, and some no longer required
hospital treatment. Impact won the NHS Alliance Acorn Award in
2006, yet funding was not renewed. People can no longer self-refer,
but GPs can refer. Demand for Impact’s service is still very high,
and 85% of patients who completed a survey reported being very
satisfied.[xi]
·
Bristol Homeopathic Hospital surveyed what happened to 6,500
patients over six years. 70% reported improvement in their symptoms
and well being for conditions
which had not responded to conventional treatment.[xii]
·
A review by an NHS Community Menopause/PMS clinic in
Sheffield reports high levels of benefit in reducing menopausal
symptoms as well as improved mood and quality of life following
homeopathic treatment.[xiii]
·
RLHH offers
care for people with mental health problems. The media recently
highlighted the scarcity of services for people suffering from
depression. Many doctors acknowledge that prescribing
anti-depressants is over-used, often inappropriate and ineffective
and has harmful side effects. RLHH users have been referred to
alternative treatments which have helped them get off or reduce the
use of anti-depressants.
·
Waltham Forest PCT has successfully integrated homeopathy
into a Mental Health Strategy. This work won the NHS Alliance Acorn
Award in 2005.
·
The Society
of Homeopaths National Service Evaluation found 87% of patients with
mental and emotional problems reported positive changes with
homeopathy.
·
Some of us
are volunteers at the Crossroads Women’s Centre in Camden which runs
a homeopathic clinic for destitute and low income women, often
asylum seekers who have severe health problems as a result of rape
and other torture. We have seen great improvements in their health
despite their desperate situation.
3. Homeopathy is safe.
Homeopathy has no side effects or
danger of addiction or toxicity. Pregnant women, children, young
people and pets can all be treated successfully with it.
Drug based treatment however can
lead to effects worse than the original problem.
Medical decisions have
been found to be the third leading cause of death, and prescribed
pharmaceutical drugs are the fourth leading cause of death.[xiv]
The House of Commons Health
Committee highlighted the disadvantages of the increasing use of and
reliance on pharmaceutical medicines: “The inappropriate or
excessive use … can cause distress, ill-health, hospitalisation and
even death.”[xv]
4. Homeopathy is cost effective.
Increased use of
homeopathy could lead to large benefits and savings to the NHS.
·
One
homeopathic prescription can cost as little as 16p. Compare that to
the £7bn+ the NHS spends each year on conventional drugs.[xvi]
The need for many of these drugs is reduced or avoided by
homeopathy. Cutting access to the RLHH will cost the NHS more, not
less.
·
Homeopathy helps prevent ill health. Aside from avoiding side
effects and drug dependency which then require further expensive
treatments, it can prevent complications associated, for example,
with childhood illnesses or childbirth.
·
A pilot study showed that doctors practicing homeopathic medicine
issue fewer prescriptions and at lower cost than their non
homeopathic colleagues.[xvii]
·
Every £1 spent on promoting health in the workplace can lead to a
saving of £2.50 for employers.[xviii]
What would the savings if preventative healthcare, such as
homeopathy, was promoted in Brent and nationally?
·
Despite
this cost-effectiveness, NHS
investment in complementary medicine is just 0.5% of the NHS budget.
·
Most
private
health companies and many insurance policies consider homeopathic
treatment a good investment.[xix]
Why not Brent PCT?
5. Why is the RLHH under attack?
Why is a therapy which causes no
harm constantly under attack when conventional drug treatment which
has such a lethal record is not? Most people are aware that the
pharmaceutical industry – one
of the biggest in the world with the oil and arms industries, with
sales of
643
billion dollars of which 17% ($109.31 billion) is profit
– increasingly dictates
the priorities of the NHS. With such massive profits at stake, the
pharmaceutical industry has
tried to discredit any form of treatment which presents an
alternative, and therefore poses a threat, to its hegemony.
It has tried to discredit
homeopathy and GPs who use it by employing ‘Quackbusters’, many of
whom have been exposed as professional litigators with almost no
knowledge or experience of the therapies they are paid to attack[xx]
A letter signed by 13 prominent
doctors (21 May 2006) urged PCTs to end their contracts[xxi],
saying they were wasting their funding on “implausible” treatment
with no “convincing evidence of effectiveness”.[xxii]
At least three of the
signatories have connections with pharmaceutical companies and act
in their interest.[xxiii]
The clinical study which the PCT cited as the leading evidence
against homeopathy has been widely discredited internationally
on grounds of flawed and
inappropriate methodology and political interference.[xxiv]
The decision to terminate the
contract with the RLHH has nothing to do with health or with saving
money. The cost of Brent PCT’s contract with RLHH in 2006 was
£142,000, less than one GP’s salary[xxv].
Nor is the PCT doing anything to locate the £10 million which they
have “lost” over the past two years, and which makes up nearly half
of their “overspend”.[xxvi]
The decision has everything to do
with the pharmaceutical industry tightening its grip on the NHS. Why is Brent PCT serving unaccountable vested interests
over the health needs of NHS users under its care?
6.
The RLHH belongs to us all.
The homeopathic hospitals have been an integral part
of the NHS since it started in 1948. Aneurin Bevan, who created
the NHS, gave a commitment that ”homeopathic
institutions will be enabled to provide their own form of treatment
and that the continuity of the characteristics of those institutions
will be maintained”.[xxvii]
The Royal Family chooses homeopathy over other forms of healthcare,
and people on high incomes who can afford the best increasingly do
so. But those of us on low incomes are denied access and have to
struggle to pay for what we also consider the best.
According to the
Society of Homeopaths,
the private market
for homeopathy is growing at around 20% per year,
making it one of the fastest growth
sectors in the UK today. Why isn’t this demand reflected in NHS
provision?
The RLHH has recently been renovated
largely by donations from patients. The legality of denying Brent
patients access to a service which they have paid for through
National Insurance contributions and donations is being looked into
by the British Homeopathic Association.
While the government spends
billions on war in Iraq and Afghanistan – bombing, killing, maiming
and torturing innocent people against the wishes of the majority of
the UK population – it is simultaneously cutting and privatising
access to essential holistic, low cost, popular and effective
healthcare services such as the RLHH. Instead of cutting access,
more patients must be made aware of this service and Brent GPs must
be encouraged to refer more people to the RLHH as well as to other
registered homeopaths.
The RLHH has always been part of the NHS. This principle of free
access to all must remain. We don’t want the RLHH to be only for
the Royals!
Signed:
Jenny Hautman (Student homeopath & cancer fighter) and Brent
residents:
Niki Adams, Cristel
Amiss, Kristina
Brandemo, Sara Callaway, Senka Causevic, Kay Chapman, Hanna Demel,
Michael Coleman, Philip Dymond, Sian Evans, Mr Faruqi, Mrs S Faruqi,
Joan Fittall, Solveig Francis, Mr and Mrs Gajjar, Giorgio
Giandomenici, Alex Hall, Selma James, Mr Khan, Mrs Ranjan Kundalia,
Mr Kundalia, Lisa Longstaff, Nina Lopez, Cari Mitchell, Anne Neale,
Tim Owens, Sylvia Salley, Anju Shah, Anna Thorburn.
Reply to:
Solveig Francis solveig@crossroadswomen.net
c/o Crossroads Women’s Centre, PO Box 287, London NW6 5QU
Copy
to:
Prince of Wales; The
Queen; Sarah Teather MP, Lib Dem, Brent East; Barry Gardiner MP,
Labour, Brent North; Dawn Butler MP, Labour, Brent South; Baroness
Mar; Brent Health Select Committee; Local Brent Councillors; Patient
Advice and Liaison Service; Healthcare Commission Complaints
Investigation Team; The Health Service Ombudsman; Valerie Lawler,
Royal London Homeopathic Hospital
[i]
Patients Picket for Homeopathy Harrow Observer, 13
June 07 details case-studies.
i. Clinical Governance for Complementary and Alternative
Medicine in Primary Care, Final Report to the Department of
Health and the King’s Fund, University of Westminster,
2004
ii. BBC News Online 16 August 2005
iii. GP magazine, November 2004
iv. Which? Survey 2003
v. Alliance for Natural Health, February 2007
vi.
Impact Integrated Medicine Project in Nottingham, Annual
Report 2006: 48% of our patients are from Black and Minority
Ethnic groups, in an area where the BME population overall
is 28%. Interpreters are provided for all patients who do
not speak English, so we have been able to work with asylum
seekers and refugees, all of whom are dealing
with physical and psychological trauma (www.impact-imp.co.uk).
[viii]
Impact Integrated Medicine Project in Nottingham, Annual
Report 2006: 38% of our patients are men. As Roger Williams,
Nottingham City PCT comments, “You know it’s working when
38% of your patients are men. Men don’t normally get too
bothered about their health, but with this they turn out.
The feedback has been very good indeed and
there are people using Impact who would not usually access
the normal service. It’s extremely impressive.” Communities
Today magazine, February 2005
[ix]
The Role of Complementary and
Alternative Medicine in the NHS led by Christopher
Smallwood, October 2005
[x]
[xi]
www.impact-imp.co.uk
[xii]
Drs David Spence, Elizabeth Thompson and SJ Barron, October
2005, Homeopathic Treatment for Chronic Disease: A 6 year
university hospital outpatient observational
study, The Journal of Complementary and Alternative
Medicine, Vol 11 No 5, 793 -798.
[xiii]
Relton C, Weatherley-Jones E, May
2005, “Homeopathy service in a National Health Service
community menopause clinic: audit of clinical outcomes” in
Journal of the
British Menopause Society
[xiv]
Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol 284, July
26, 2000
[xv]
[xvi]
[xvii]
Swayne, Jeremy, 1992, “The cost and effectiveness of
homeopathy” in the British Homeopathic Journal Vol 81, pages
148-150.
[xviii]
[xix]
[xx]
www.quackpotwatch.org
[xxi]
The letter was circulated in the NHS with NHS letterhead,
which is entirely unethical as the 13 doctors do not form
any group or committee of the NHS. The doctors have
been reported to the General Medical Council for
unprofessional conduct. The letter was also published in
the Times
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article1827553.ece
One of the letter’s signatories David Colquhoun runs a
website which speaks for itself, hardly “considered or
balanced”, it constitutes a rant against homeopathy and
alternative approaches
http://www.dcscience.net/improbable.html
[xxii]
http://www.homeopathy-soh.org/whats-new/past-press-releases
[xxiii]
Michael Baum, Emeritus Professor of Surgery at University
College, worked for Astro-Zeneca in-house for years, and
actively promotes breast-cancer drugs manufactured
by them, recently tamoxifen and anastrozole, see
http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CAC02.htm
-- page sponsored by Wellcome. For more background on
the Spiked website and the campaigning group “Sense About
Science” see George Monbiot The Invasion of the Entryists,
The Guardian, 9 December 2003
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/comment/story/0,,1103025,00.html.
See The Observer 8 April 2007
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2052505,00.html
for Baum’s publicly stated interest in having his patients
use the buildings currently occupied by the RLHH. Baum’s
article in the Daily Mail “Homeopathy is Worse than
Witchcraft”,
1 May 2007 speaks for itself. Other references reveal Baum
has a “potential conflict of interest” including:
2004 Article on benefits of anastrozole in addition to
tamoxifen-discloses conflicts of interests and consultancy
at AstraZeneca
http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/full/22/8/1524-a
End of article-disclosure of Baum’s links to ATAC and Zeneca
Inc.He has received honoraria and
travel expenses from Novartis (medical nutrition company)
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/487384
2005-discloses links to AstraZeneca, Novartis and Pfizer inc
http://www.patternsofcare.com/2005/3/cme.htm
2006-AstraZeneca links
http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/full/24/9/1482
Sir James Black, a past
winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine, has worked for most
of his career for major pharmaceutical companies including
ICI, Smith-Kline and Wellcome,
see
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1988/black-autobio.html.
His role in modern “drug design” is noted in numerous
articles. He developed
beta-blockers, the dangers of which are now well known.
Ernst was appointed professor of
complementary medicine at the Peninsula Medical School in
Exeter, falsely reported in the press as the “first”
professor of complementary
medicine. For one list of funders and projects see:
http://www.complemed.co.uk/sotoncompmed/grants.htm.
[xxiv]
Homeopathy and The Lancet, Peter Fisher, Evidence-based
Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2006 Vol 2, No1
ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/extract/3/1/145
3(1): 145–147.
Published online 2006 January 26.
doi: 10.1093/ecam/nek007, Peter Fisher
(Director of the RLHH). “The meta-analysis formed part of
the Complementary Medicine Evaluation Programme (Programm
Evaluation Komplementärmedizin, PEK) financed by the Swiss
Federal government. The international review board of PEK
has publicly protested at political interference in the
scientific process: ‘There is a consensus among the review
board members that the final PEK process deviated from what
would have been expected by conventional standards.
Especially disconcerting was the fact that the products of
the PEK process – health technology assessment (HTA)
reports, single description of studies, manuscripts for
publication and the condensed final report – were sent to
the board members but no discussion, comment, or review was
solicited by the responsible agencies’ (2).”
[xxv]
GP pay can reach £250,000 Debbie Andalo Wednesday
May 11, 2005
SocietyGuardian.co.uk and
Daily Mail, 17 July 2007 Rise
of the £250,000 GP with half now on
six-figure salaries
[xxvi]
Brent Turnaround Director Phil Church noted the missing £10
million without a trace of embarrassment in a meeting with
patients and the RLHH on 30 April 2007.
He told us that we could not continue our treatment because
it was “like running a car”, “when there’s no money [for
servicing] the car stops”.
An Early Day Motion
on the NHS Homoeopathic Hospitals was tabled
yesterday. We need to get 200 MPs to sign. Please
distribute and urge people to ask their MPs to
sign:
Dear Supporter,
Early Day Motion in the House of
Commons on NHS Homeopathic
Hospitals
I am writing to ask you to support an
important parliamentary Early
Day Motion (EDM) which may lead
to a parliamentary debate on NHS
Homeopathy. The number of the
EDM is 1240, the text is below.
To be successful it needs the signatures
of at least 200 MPs. Please
contact your MP, preferably by
phone on 0207 219 3000 (you can
also write or email) and ask him
or her to sign
Early Day Motion 1240 on ‘NHS
Homeopathic Hospitals’. Please ask your friends and family to do the
same, as soon as possible.
EDMs are parliamentary petitions which can be signed by any MPs
except Members of the Government
or opposition front benches. To
have influence it needs cross
party support and the support of
‘respected’ members. See the
fact sheet attached for more
information.
Thank you for your support.
Peter Fisher
Clinical Director
Royal London Homeopathic
Hospital
EDM 1240
NHS HOMEOPATHIC HOSPITALS
28.03.2007
Vis, Rudi MP
“That this House welcomes the
positive contribution made to
the health of the nation by the
NHS homeopathic hospitals; notes
that some six million people use
complementary treatments each
year; believes that
complementary medicine has the
potential to offer
clinically-effective and
cost-effective solutions to
common health problems faced by
NHS patients, including chronic
difficult to treat conditions
such as musculoskeletal and
other chronic pain, eczema,
depression, anxiety and
insomnia, allergy, chronic
fatigue and irritable bowel
syndrome; expresses concern that
NHS cuts are threatening the
future of these hospitals; and
calls on the Government actively
to support these valuable
national assets”.
Your MP:
Barnet
Chipping Barnet: Theresa Villiers
Finchley & Golders Green: Dr Rudi
Vis (no point writing, he is the
sponsor)
Hendon: Andrew Dismore
Brent
Brent East: Sarah Teather
Brent North: Barry Gardiner
Brent South: Dawn Butler
Camden
Hampstead & Highgate: Glenda Jackson
Holborn & St Pancras: Frank Dobson
Hammersmith and Fulham
Ealing, Acton & Shepherd's Bush: Andy Slaughter
Hammersmith & Fulham: Greg Hands
Harrow
Harrow East: Tony McNulty
Harrow West: Gareth Thomas
Kensington and Chelsea
Kensington & Chelsea: Sir Malcolm
Rifkind
Regent's Park & Kensington North:
Karen Buck
Westminster
Cities of London & Westminster Mark Field
Regent's Park & Kensington North
Karen Buck
All at:
House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA
If your MP doesn’t appear in this
list and you don’t know his/her
name, you can find it at:
www.theyworkforyou.com
or
www.parliament.uk. You can also
email your MP this way.
What's an EDM? Find out more here -
EDM Fact Sheet:
www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/p03.pdf
|